He has additionally gone past state strains for such data. In November, Mr. Paxton despatched a subpoena to the Seattle Kids’s Hospital, in search of data of sufferers from Texas who had obtained the care there. The hospital system sued the lawyer common’s workplace in December, and a choose has but to rule on that case.
The paperwork case just isn’t the primary time PFLAG has challenged Texas’ makes an attempt to forestall gender-affirming look after transgender youth. In 2022, the group efficiently requested a choose to briefly block Gov. Greg Abbott’s order to research households who’ve transgender youngsters receiving gender-affirming care or therapy for gender dysphoria. That order additionally stemmed from Mr. Paxton, who has claimed that gender-affirming look after transgender youngsters is “youngster abuse.” The end result of that lawsuit can be pending.
Medical professionals have debated which youngsters must be receiving gender-affirming remedies and at what age. However main medical teams in the USA, together with the American Academy of Pediatrics, say such care must be out there to minors and oppose legislative bans.
PFLAG additionally challenged the state’s ban on gender-affirming look after minors after it was signed into regulation. That case over the constitutionality of the regulation continues to be ongoing, however the state’s Supreme Courtroom in September allowed the ban to take impact within the meantime.
A number of lawsuits have been lodged in different states to problem their gender-affirming care bans. In November, plaintiffs within the case towards Tennessee’s regulation petitioned the U.S. Supreme Courtroom to weigh in. The courtroom has not but selected whether or not to listen to the case.
J. David Goodman and Amy Harmon contributed reporting.